Explore Plus. Higher Education and Professional Books. Mathematics and Science Books. Enter pincode. Usually delivered in 3 weeks? Winter Eyal. Atlantic 3. Which is smarter,your head or your gut? For instance, many mutually beneficial commitments—such as marriage, or being a member of a team—are only possible when underscored by emotion rather than deliberate thought. The difference between pleasurable music and bad noise is mathematically precise; yet it is also the result of evolution. And our inherent overconfidence—the mathematically impossible fact that most people see themselves as above average—affords us advantages in competing for things we benefit from, like food and money and romance.
Other subjects illuminated in the book include the rationality of seemingly illogical feelings like trust, anger, shame, ego, and generosity. Already a bestseller in Israel, Feeling Smart brings together game theory, evolution, and behavioral science to produce a surprising and very persuasive defense of how we think, even when we don't.
- SearchWorks Catalog.
- A Cognitive Psychology of Mass Communication!
- KIRKUS REVIEW;
- Grain Power: Over 100 Delicious Gluten-Free Ancient Grains & Superblend Recipes.
- More upcoming events.
Reviews Review Policy. Published on. Flowing text, Original pages. Best For. Web, Tablet, Phone, eReader. Content Protection. Read Aloud. Learn More. Flag as inappropriate. It syncs automatically with your account and allows you to read online or offline wherever you are. Please follow the detailed Help center instructions to transfer the files to supported eReaders.
Follow Utrecht University
More related to decision-making. See more. Decision making or making judgments is an essential function in the ordinary life of any individual. Decisions can often be made easily, but sometimes, it can be difficult due to conflict, uncertainty, or ambiguity of the variables required to make the decision. As human beings, we constantly have to decide between different activities such as occupational, recreational, political, economic, etc.
These decisions can be transcendental or inconsequential. Ian Robertson. The way that we assess and overcome problems is an essential part of everyday life. Problem Solving provides a clear introduction to the underlying mental processes involved in solving problems.
Drawing on research from cognitive psychology and neuroscience, it examines the methods and techniques used by both novices and experts in familiar and unfamiliar situations. Problem Solving fully engages the reader with the difficulties and methodologies associated with problem solving.
Feeling Smart: Why our Emotions are More Rational than We Think | About | University of Stirling
This book will be of great use to undergraduate students of cognitive psychology, education and neuroscience, as well as readers and professionals with an interest in problem solving. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Daniel Kahneman. Thinking and Deciding: Edition 4. Jonathan Baron. Beginning with its first edition and through subsequent editions, Thinking and Deciding has established itself as the required text and important reference work for students and scholars of human cognition and rationality.
In this fourth edition, first published in , Jonathan Baron retains the comprehensive attention to the key questions addressed in the previous editions - how should we think? What, if anything, keeps us from thinking that way? How can we improve our thinking and decision making?
Feeling Smart Why Our Emotions Are More Rational Than We Think
Maybe you think he just has an interesting family, but the reality is that many people have or know an Uncle Ezra, Uncle Walter, or Hans Winter. Peppered across the book are descriptions of outcomes of game experiments that bring out how we behave differently depending the context. For example, he describes an experiment that shows how Palestinians, Chinese, and Israelis all act differently in terms of generosity. Per the book:. My colleagues compared the behaviors of Israeli, Palestinian, and Chinese players in the experiment using the giving and taking games.
Each pair of players always involved players from the same culture. Israelis gave relatively small amounts in the giving game, but took large amounts for themselves in the taking game. Palestinians gave relatively large amounts in the giving game but also took large amounts for themselves in the taking game.
- nauzanathedless.ga | Feeling Smart, Eyal Winter | | Boeken?
- The Turning.
- Games and Information.
- Feeling Smart (e-bok) | Eyal Winter | ARK Bokhandel!
The Chinese players gave relatively small amounts in the giving game and also took small amounts for themselves in the taking game. Palestinians…were very generous in the giving game while being selfish in the taking game. This hints that Palestinians emphasize nonmonetary considerations, such as expectations of reciprocity, in their decision-making. Their behavior was influenced by what they expected others to do….
The Chinese players showed a respect for property and a striving to avoid overly generous actions on the one hand and causing harm to others on the other hand. They gave in moderation and in turn took in moderation, preferring as much as possible to end the game with the same amount of money as they received at the start of the game.
In another example, he brings out other cross-cultural differences while describing the Ultimatum game ,. One published research paper on the subject compared ultimatum game players in the United States, Japan, Slovenia, and Israel. The research study found significant differences between different cultures, whether players were in the role of proposers or responders.
Players in Israel tended to propose the lowest offers for dividing the money. Japan was not far behind Israel, in second place in terms of the selfishness of the offers made by proposing players. Players in Slovenia and the United States were much more generous in their offers.